Genativity

Benchmark

Animation and 3D leaderboard

Every model runs the same 6 prompts on this board. A vision model scores each clip blind against the original prompt in a single pass, across visual fidelity, physics and motion, subject consistency, prompt adherence and audio sync. Scores are out of 5, and the 95% CI column shows how much a score could plausibly move on a re-run with this few samples. Full methodology.

Board: Overall · Hands · Faces · Liquids · On-screen text · Multi-shot · Lip-sync · Camera · Animals · Style · Image to video · Animation

Look: Realism · Animation and 3D

Animation and 3D adds the anime walk and claymation tests from the core battery to the animation set: 2D cartoon, anime and 3D feature looks. Sora 2 was retired before the animation set was added, so it has no clips on it and is left off this view.

Round: all · v1-vivix-2026-10 · v1-2026-10 · v1-2026-09 · anim1-2026-10

Clip shown: every model here on the same prompt, “anim-walk-cycle”, so the preview is a fair comparison, not a cherry-picked best clip.

#ModelClipOverall95% CIFidelity VisualPhysicsConsistency AudioAttemptsGen (s) $/runRuns
1 Google Veo 3.1
Google
4.85 ±0.19 4.88 4.88 4.63 5.00 — — — — 4
2 Google Gemini Omni
Google
4.85 ±0.25 4.75 5.00 4.88 4.75 — — — — 4
3 Seedance 2.0
ByteDance
4.72 ±0.44 4.13 5.00 4.88 4.88 — 2.00 — — 4
4 MiniMax H3
MiniMax
4.69 ±0.74 4.63 4.88 4.50 4.75 — — — — 4
5 FLUX 3
Black Forest Labs
4.63 ±0.49 4.50 4.88 4.38 4.75 — — — — 4
6 Vivix W1 preview
Vivix
4.57 ±0.5 4.13 4.88 4.63 4.63 — 1.00 20 $0.026 4
7 Grok Video
xAI
4.57 ±0.35 4.50 5.00 4.25 4.50 — — — — 4
8 Wan 3.0 preview
Alibaba
4.53 ±0.62 4.25 5.00 4.25 4.63 — — — — 4
9 Kling 4.0 preview
Kuaishou
4.53 ±0.52 4.50 4.88 4.13 4.63 — — — — 4
10 Kling 3.0
Kuaishou
4.50 ±0.63 4.13 4.88 4.38 4.63 — — — — 4
11 Seedance 2.5
ByteDance
4.44 ±0.74 4.00 4.88 4.00 4.88 — 2.00 — — 4
12 Kling 3.0 Turbo
Kuaishou
4.41 ±0.57 4.25 4.63 4.25 4.50 — — — — 4
13 Runway Gen-4.5
Runway
4.25 ±0.86 4.38 4.50 4.25 3.88 — — — — 4
14 MiniMax Hailuo 02
MiniMax
4.13 ±0.58 3.88 4.50 4.00 4.13 — — — — 4
15 PixVerse v5.5
PixVerse
3.82 ±0.47 3.25 4.38 3.50 4.13 — — — — 4

Attempts is the average number of generations needed before one was usable, the number that actually decides what a model costs you. 95% CI is computed from that model's own runs on this board, not assumed. On a category board with only 4 runs per model, a wide CI is the honest reflection of a small sample, not a bug. Two models whose CIs overlap are not meaningfully different at this sample size.

Cite this

Free to cite and reuse with a link back. Data is updated as new runs and prices come in, so include the date.

Genativity. (2026). Animation and 3D leaderboard: AI video models ranked. Retrieved October 23, 2026, from https://genativity.com/leaderboard/animated
<a href="https://genativity.com/leaderboard/animated">Animation and 3D leaderboard: AI video models ranked</a> (Genativity)

Frequently asked

Which AI video model is best at Animation and 3D right now?

As of 23 October 2026, Google Veo 3.1 by Google ranks #1 on Animation and 3D on Genativity's benchmark, scoring 4.85/5 across 4 scored runs (±0.19 at 95% confidence).